Today I will show you a simple benchmark between 2 library from previous post. Duel between https://github.com/shopspring/decimal with https://github.com/mercari/go-bps. The API of both library is similar in calculation but totally different with initialization, get amount, and conversion to string API.
In this benchmark I only compare simple calculation and string conversion.
Simple add calculation
helper function
func decimalAdd(addition decimal.Decimal, n int) decimal.Decimal {
result := decimal.NewFromInt(0)
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
result = result.Add(addition)
}
return result
}
func bpsAdd(addition *bps.BPS, n int) *bps.BPS {
result := bps.NewFromAmount(0)
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
result = result.Add(addition)
}
return result
}Benchmark with 0.01 and 0.0000001 addition
func BenchmarkShopspring001DecimalAdd(b *testing.B) {
addition := decimal.NewFromFloat(0.01)
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
decimalAdd(addition, n)
}
}
func BenchmarkShopspringPPMDecimalAdd(b *testing.B) {
addition := decimal.NewFromFloat(0.000001)
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
decimalAdd(addition, n)
}
}
func BenchmarkShopspring1000DecimalAdd(b *testing.B) {
addition := decimal.NewFromFloat(0.000001)
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
decimalAdd(addition, 1000)
}
}
func BenchmarkMercari001BpsAdd(b *testing.B) {
addition := bps.NewFromPercentage(1)
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
bpsAdd(addition, n)
}
}
func BenchmarkMercariPPMBpsAdd(b *testing.B) {
addition := bps.NewFromPPM(big.NewInt(1))
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
bpsAdd(addition, n)
}
}
func BenchmarkMercari1000BpsAdd(b *testing.B) {
addition := bps.NewFromPercentage(1)
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
bpsAdd(addition, 1000)
}
}Conversion to string
func BenchmarkShopspringStringDecimalConvert(b *testing.B) {
value := decimal.NewFromFloat(0.000001)
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
value.StringFixed(10)
}
}
func BenchmarkMercariStringBpsConvert(b *testing.B) {
value := bps.NewFromPPM(big.NewInt(1))
for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
b.StopTimer()
b.StartTimer()
value.FloatString(10)
}
}Result
Running tool: /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/go test -benchmem -run=^$ -bench ^(BenchmarkShopspring001DecimalAdd|BenchmarkShopspringPPMDecimalAdd|BenchmarkMercari001BpsAdd|BenchmarkMercariPPMBpsAdd|BenchmarkShopspringStringDecimalConvert|BenchmarkMercariStringBpsConvert)$ github.com/h4ckm03d/golang-playground/6-practical-benchmark
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/h4ckm03d/golang-playground/6-practical-benchmark
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500 CPU @ 3.40GHz
BenchmarkShopspring001DecimalAdd-4 10000 389385 ns/op 400041 B/op 10003 allocs/op
BenchmarkShopspringPPMDecimalAdd-4 10000 380516 ns/op 400088 B/op 10004 allocs/op
BenchmarkMercari001BpsAdd-4 10000 1267632 ns/op 879983 B/op 40000 allocs/op
BenchmarkMercariPPMBpsAdd-4 10000 1300074 ns/op 879983 B/op 40000 allocs/op
BenchmarkShopspringStringDecimalConvert-4 1000000 1026 ns/op 240 B/op 12 allocs/op
BenchmarkMercariStringBpsConvert-4 935912 1164 ns/op 320 B/op 16 allocs/op
PASS
ok github.com/h4ckm03d/golang-playground/6-practical-benchmark 63.276sThe result of calculation above show the shopspring/decimal is faster and memory allocation is smaller compare to mercari/go-bps.
But the string conversion of result is pretty similar compared to the calculation result and the winner still shopspring/decimal.
So the winner is shopspring/decimal and I think both of them is still fast because the slowest operation takes 1267632ns ~ 1.267632ms ~ 0.001267632 seconds. The choice is yours now, which one do you prefer?
Check complete codes in the https://github.com/h4ckm03d/golang-playground/blob/master/6-practical-benchmark/decimal_test.go